Quote of the moment - By all means email any worthy quotes


    What does a fish know of water in which it swims all its life? What does a man know of nature of which he is an integral part? The ancient answer is: he knows and he knows not. (cited in Saraswati, 1995 (Ed) Man in Nature)


    The more I have learned in life, and I have learned a lot, the less confident I am in what I know. From this, I conclude that adamancy is a sign of ignorance. M. Ferguson 2010- Polymathica

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

Implementing change in a classroom

I was recently asked how to implement change towards more contemporary Technology Education thinking within a resistant traditional school environment. 

May I suggest the best answers lie with those who contribute to literature on Change management and Innovation diffusion.

Upon brief reflection, here are a few things I have found myself adopting in my experiences [in no particular order]. 

1) Do nothing but listen and learn.
As a mentor says to me, "sometimes the best thing to do can be to do nothing at all".   It is best to be sure One is perceiving the circumstance accurately.  Accept any criticism and hostility (yes, hostility happens).  Perhaps you might need to "watch" and learn for a while.  
SO, following technacy principles, we could work out what is going on within the context that you think needs changing because it might not need to change the way you think.   Through a proper analysis you will have the benefit of being able to put forward a clear statement of what really needs changing and how it will be better if things change. AND always seek the best for the students, not self.

2) Steam-train approach (build up energy and ride the thrill)
Just go ahead and change and lead by example.  You might be very surprised, I was.  One might expect to lose students when demanding more written evidence of learning through planning. Interestingly enrollments in that class actually increased and both the gender and capability balance started to even out.  I have also heard advice that to start with, pick one class and change the way you do things in that class.  As long as you are fulfilling your professional responsibilities legally (Syllabus, Safety etc etc) and as long as your conviction is grounded in rational and defensible scholarly evidence.  Always back up your decisions with the best thinking and evidence you possibly can AND be prepared to be found wrong.

3) Show-off your successes (and even failures) 
Invite school leadership to join in some of your classes, to ask students questions etc. I have found my Principals were generally willing to get out of the office [if they could] and get to know what the students were doing in my classes.  That your students are engaged, learning and even excited to be learning in your class will do more to convince parents and administration staff than anything you could pontificate as a self-proclaimed expert.  If your hunches are right then even small successes will show clear advantages for possible change.

4) Grow thick skin
 I find this the most difficult. Be prepared to be labelled and ridiculed behind your back.  Your good intentions (if that is what they are) may be viewed quite differently and One could speculate as to why.  

5) Don't be a ZAX
If you find stubborn opposition then find somewhere else to implement your ideas.   It may also be that you will not succeed in bringing about a change for a variety of reasons (organisational and cultural barriers within institutions, personality clashes, and yes, even an  incomplete personal knowledge base).   I have found [for me at least] that it is best  to suppress the ego and NOT stubbornly stand your ground. If you are stubborn, then the rest of the world will progress regardless and you will miss out on joining in the fun.   SO, I found that to maintain my integrity, it best to step to the side.  Work to progress forward by moving around the obstacle.  Else, you might find yourself becoming a ZAX, unable to learn, grow and develop professionally; becoming stale and critical of everything and every one and refusing to change even when the world around you is doing something else.






Friday, 7 March 2008

Papers, essays etc by Jason E Newcombe



Papers are currently accessable via 'Scribd'. All work is in draft format (pre-publication) only.
Access is via the respective link or by going to SCRIBD directly and conduct a search

This goes directly to my Btn_brn_77x28 profile


Conference presentations

NEWCOMBE, J. & SEEMANN, K. 2008. Skilling out technological intelligence: A skills-climate paradox. Paper presented at the 5th biennial international conference on technology education research: Crowne Plaza Hotel, Surfers Paradise, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, 27-29 November 2008: Griffith institute for educational research: Griffith University.


NEWCOMBE, J. E. 2006. Core disciplined study of technology: Of value but not valued? In: MIDDLETON, H., PAVLOVA, M. & ROEBUCK, D. (eds.) 4th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research Values in Technology Education [CDROM version] Crowne Plaza Surfers Paradise, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia 7- 9 December.: Centre for learning research, Griffith University.


NEWCOMBE, J. E. 2004. Expert conceptions of technology education: Convergences and divergences. IPaper presented at the 3rd biennial conference on technology education research-Learning for Innovation in technology. Crowne Plaza, Gold Coast Australia, 9-11 December: Centre of learning research, Griffith University


NEWCOMBE, J. E. 2000. Conceptualising technology educaiton for general education: a delphi study. Bachelor of Technology Education with Honours Unpublished Dissertation, Griffith University.

Magazines and short pieces.

Technology Roman roads. Of course, they "go with out saying". 
This short piece was submitted and published in a modified form within a postgraduate association's annual magazine.

Feeding skills shortages in a technological society: Which ones? where and for how long?
This is an abstract and a brief summary for a Presentation at ‘Praxis 2007’; the Southern Cross university postgraduate association’s multi-disciplinary conference.

Thursday, 6 March 2008

What on earth is Meta- Technacy

Meta- Technacy is really only an emerging concept for the purpose of raising awareness for informed holistic technology understanding.  

Look, words are of little consequence by themselves but what IS powerful are the ideas words represent. First at one level, consider the word roots in layperson terms:  Meta-above, beyond, after, over; Techne-Craft; ~acy-state of, possessing a quality.

So here 'meta' represents the idea that to have learnt knowledge is one thing but to really know how we come to know and to know WHY we know- now that takes a whole other level of awareness and reasoning.
Technacy refers to possessing a rounded capability founded in essential core principles of technology as a phenomena. That is best explained by others... in this peer reviewed journal paper on the Basic Principles and in a general overview in Wikipedia.

SO what is the antithesis position or the alternative to meta-technacy? Ask, what would it mean to NOT have awareness of how you understand the technology around you? Indeed the problem is that it is difficult to actually 'know what you don't know' and all that is left is to somehow be guided in a way that helps you discover your own ignorance.